Welcome! This site is written for Social Security disability claimants, for their legal representatives, and for the network of people involved in the Social Security disability claim process. I hope you find it helpful.
Free Claim Review

Step 5

Subscribe to Step 5

Your Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) is the cornerstone of your Social Security disability claim. Unless you meet a listed impairment, the administration's assessment of your RFC will decide the outcome of your disability claim.

The RFC is Social Security's assessment of your abilities to do sustained physical and mental activities on a regular and continuing basis in a work setting. The RFC considers only those funtional limitations resulting from medically determinable impairments.

The RFC is used to determine whether or not you can return to your past relevant work (step 4 of the sequential evaluation process) or do other work (step 5 of the sequential evaluation process).

For more about your RFC, read Social Security Ruling 96-8p.

Most Social Security disability are decided on a medical-vocational basis. To be awarded disability benefits, you first must be unable to perform your past relevant work. Additionally, you must be unable to do other work that exists in substantial numbers in the national economy. This is step 5 of Social Security's 5-step sequential evaluation.

I talk with prospective clients almost every day. And often, there is a misunderstanding regarding the requirement to be unable to perform "other work."

For those under age 50, even an unskilled sedentary job must be beyond your current abilities. So if you were a construction worker, for example, and have no training for a desk-type job, it does not matter. You do not qualify for disability benefits if you have still the physical and mental ability to perform unskilled sedentary work. Thousands of disability claims are denied by Social Security on this basis. 

For those age 55 or older, there are some helpful rules at step 5, because your age is a relevant vocational factor. But disability is by no means automatic for those over age 55.

Let me give you an example. I talked with an former commerical airline pilot recently. He can't be a pilot anymore, which is obviously a very high performing job, due to moderate depression and insomnia. But even at age 58, that former pilot is quite able to other work. The medical-vocational guidelines do not automatically direct a finding of "disabled" for such a claim. 

While the medical-vocational rules often assist those over 55, those rules alone do not make a successful claim. That is why those age 55 or over may benefit the most from having a Social Security disability lawyer involved at the very beginning of the claim process.

For every person applying for Social Security disability benefits, you must have real reasons, supported by medical evidence, why you cannot perform other work.

**********************************

Get help from a lawyer with your disability claim 

If you are considering an application for Social Security disability benefits, or have already applied and want assistance with your claim, please contact Gordon Gates for a free consultation.

When I talk with clients and potential clients, I often hear stories about their inability to find work. Unfortunately, whether or not you can realistically get hired for a job is not a consideration for Social Security disability benefits. Instead, the SSA must find that you are unable to work before you will be awarded disability benefits.

There is an important distinction in Social Security disability practice between the inability to find work and the inability to perform work. The SSA has a regulation on this issue. See 20 CFR 404.1566, which states in part:

We will determine that you are not disabled if your residual functional capacity and vocational abilities make it possible for you to do work which exists in the national economy, but you remain unemployed because of—

(1) Your inability to get work;

(2) Lack of work in your local area;

(3) The hiring practices of employers;

(4) Technological changes in the industry in which you have worked;

(5) Cyclical economic conditions;

(6) No job openings for you;

(7) You would not actually be hired to do work you could otherwise do; or

(8) You do not wish to do a particular type of work.

At step 5 of the sequential evaluation, Social Security will match your residual functional capacity to the requirements of jobs in the national economy. For the purposes of a Social Security disability determination, it doesn’t matter if no employer would hire you.

You may be unemployable as a practical matter, but still not disabled under SSA rules. That is why disability lawyers focus on developing evidence of your functional limitations. We must demonstrate your inability to maintain employment, regardless of whether or not an employer would hire you.

Likewise, when I prepare clients for their hearings, I always discuss the answer to the question “Why can’t you work?” An answer unrelated to your functional limitations is not an appropriate answer to that question.

Colorado Springs disability attorney Tomasz Stasiuk recently published an article entitled Criminal records, hire-ability, and Social Security disability. He writes:

The problem is that in disability cases, Social Security does not take hire-ability into consideration when deciding if an individual is disabled. In Social Security disability and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) cases, Social Security only looks at whether an individual is able to perform the duties of the job. Social Security does not consider whether an individual is actually likely to be hired for a job.

Tomasz is exactly right. The inability to get work, by itself, does not lead to a disability finding. Social Security’s regulations, specifically 20 CFR 404.1566(c), state:

Inability to obtain work. We will determine that you are not disabled if your residual functional capacity and vocational abilities make it possible for you to do work which exists in the national economy, but you remain unemployed because of—

(1) Your inability to get work;

(2) Lack of work in your local area;

(3) The hiring practices of employers;

(4) Technological changes in the industry in which you have worked;

(5) Cyclical economic conditions;

(6) No job openings for you;

(7) You would not actually be hired to do work you could otherwise do; or

(8) You do not wish to do a particular type of work. 

At step 5 of the sequential evaluation, Social Security will match your functional abilities against the requirements of of jobs in the national economy. For the purposes of a Social Security disability determination, it doesn’t matter if no employer would hire you.

The ability to lift and/or carry is one of the basic building blocks of a worker's Residual Functional Capacity (RFC). However, the focus is almost always on the lifting, and it shouldn't be.

I had a conversation recently with a client with leg problems due to neuropathy. I asked about lifting 20 pounds (required for light exertional work). The client replied "I can lift that, but I can't do anything once I've got it." He could lift but he could not carry.

Several medical conditions (including degenerative joint disease of the hip, knee, or ankle, peripheral neuropathy in the feet, or peripheral vascular disease) can allow a claimant to lift but not carry 20 pounds or more on a sustained basis. A claimant must have the ability to both lift and carry 20 pounds for the light exertional level.

This issue is particularly important for those claimants age 50 or over, since (once past relevant work is precluded at step 4) they must have an RFC at the unskilled sedentary exertional level to prevail under the medical vocational guidelines at step 5. 

Social Security considers the age of the claimant at step 5 of the sequential evaluation. Age plays no role in steps 1 through 4.

Age is a vocational factor which dictates where you fall in the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, which are used to determine disability at step 5 for claimant’s who have physical impairments. The Guidelines may achieve different results depending on whether the claimant is under 50, age 50 to 54, or age 55 or older.

So what does one do when the claimant is on the cusp of a higher age category at the hearing? Or what does one do when the claimant crosses to the higher age category while the claim is pending? 

These are call borderline age situations, and the SSA has a regulation on point. 20 CFR 404.1563(b) states:

We will not apply the age categories mechanically in a borderline situation. If you are within a few days to a few months of reaching an older age category, and using the older age category would result in a determination or decision that you are disabled, we will consider whether to use the older age category after evaluating the overall impact of all the factors of your case.

POMS section DI 25015.005 describes factors to consider in borderline age situations.

Social Security must evaluate a claimant's ability to work on a regular and continuing basis at steps 4 and 5 of the sequential evaluation. A "regular and continuing basis" means 8 hours a day, for 5 days a week, or an equivalent work schedule (essentially, full-time work). See Social Security Ruling 96-8p and POMS Section DI 24510.057.

For most of the disability and SSI claims that I see, the claimant's ability to work on a regular and continuing basis is severely compromised. 

A disability lawyer should develop evidence that will lead the decisionmaker to the conclusion that full-time work is not possible. Several different types of evidence can help: 

  • At the top of the list is a medical source statement from a treating physician or other medical professional stating that the claimant cannot perform essential work-related functions on a full-time basis.
  • A statement of a friend or a relative.  This statement should be considered by the ALJ regarding the severity of the claimant's impairments. See Social Security Ruling 06-03p.
  • Keep a journal. This will help to track your symptoms, and how many "bad days" you experience. 
  • The claimant's testimony at the hearing. I always spend time preparing my client for this testimony, because I want to present a genuine and authentic portrait of what the claimant's life is now like. I often have the claimant discuss specific examples of events that were missed due to the impairments.

You will be found disabled at step 5 if the judge determines that you cannot work on a regular and continuing basis. You should present compelling evidence to lead the judge to this conclusion.

The Social Security Administration has special rules for claimants age 55 and over. If you can no longer perform your past relevant work, then Social Security must take your age into account when considering whether or not you can do other work at step 5 of the sequential evaluation. This principle is embodied in the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, which are used by the SSA to determine disability at step 5.

I think it is very helpful for claimants age 55 or older to have a disability lawyer's help with their initial disability application, because there are some common mistakes to avoid. I have worked with many clients in this age group, and often a claim can be granted without the necessity of a hearing if the initial application is completed properly.

I ensure that I have a winning theory of the case before filing. Then, I help the client thoroughly complete the work history report, being sure to fully describe the requirements of past work. I analyze the past work for transferable skills, which can sink a disability claim. Then, I describe the claimant's functional limitations, and ensure that all sources of medical treatment are listed, so that Social Security gets a complete medical record. Lastly, I ask the client which of his or her doctors are most supportive, so that I can get a doctor's opinion.

For the lawyer, this process means front-loading the time spent on a disability claim. The hours of getting to know a client, the medical history and work history, are all spent before even applying for benefits. For the client, getting help with the disability application means that common mistakes are avoided, all the necessary details are included, and the application is supported by a winning theory of the case.

If you are age 55 or older and can no longer do the kind of work you've done in the past, consider getting a Social Security disability lawyer involved as early as possible. There is no up front cost, and no fee at all unless your claim is successful. 

At step 5 of the sequential evaluation process, Social Security considers four factors to determine whether or not you are disabled: your residual functional capacity, your age, your education, and your work experience. 20 C.F.R. 404.1520(a)(4)(v).

Social Security defines several educational levels. See 20 C.F.R. 404.1564.

  • Illiteracy. Illiteracy means the inability to read or write. We consider someone illiterate if the person cannot read or write a simple message such as instructions or inventory lists even though the person can sign his or her name.
  • Marginal education. Marginal education means ability in reasoning, arithmetic, and language skills which are needed to do simple, unskilled types of jobs. We generally consider that formal schooling at a 6th grade level or less is a marginal education.
  • Limited education. Limited education means ability in reasoning, arithmetic, and language skills, but not enough to allow a person with these educational qualifications to do most of the more complex job duties needed in semi-skilled or skilled jobs. We generally consider that a 7th grade through the 11th grade level of formal education is a limited education.
  • High school education and above. High school education and above means abilities in reasoning, arithmetic, and language skills acquired through formal schooling at a 12th grade level or above. We generally consider that someone with these educational abilities can do semi-skilled through skilled work.
  • Inability to communicate in English. Since the ability to speak, read and understand English is generally learned or increased at school, we may consider this an educational factor. Because English is the dominant language of the country, it may be difficult for someone who doesn't speak and understand English to do a job, regardless of the amount of education the person may have in another language. Therefore, we consider a person's ability to communicate in English when we evaluate what work, if any, he or she can do.

Upcoming posts will discuss the effect of your education level upon the step 5 disability determination.

An error in the Explanation of Determination attached to your denial letter can present an opportunity for your Social Security disability attorney to practice some legal jujitsu. The error can be used to support an argument for reversal at the next stage of review. This argument is the most powerful when, but for the error in analysis, the claim should be granted.

For example, I have a new client who recently received his initial denial letter from Social Security. The explanation stated that the claimant cannot do his past work, but concluded that there is other work involving less strenuous lifting that the claimant could perform. That's standard step 5 language.

The problem with that analysis is that this claimant is almost 60 years old. Once you rule out past relevant work, if you limit a 60 year old claimant to jobs with no heavy lifting, that claimant must be found disabled (in the absence of transferable skills or education that leads to direct entry to skilled work) under Social Security's own Medical-Vocational Guidlelines.

This claim should be granted. A 60 year old claimant with an unskilled work background grids "disabled" even at the medium exertional level. {correction: actually, not quite. To grid "disabled" at the medium exertional level, a claimant must have an unskilled work background and a limited education or less. See Rule 203.02}

A recent article by Jericho, NY disability attorney Jeffrey Delott started me thinking more about this issue. Jeff wrote that he always highlights the defects in the explanation when he makes an on the record request at the hearing level.  Jeff's blog is always interesting reading, since most of his articles involve actual case stories. The blog also has a spiffy new design.